🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.